Craptastic

Chanel oh Chanel, it's only one month into 2006 and you manage to fuck up big time in just one single event. A dress wore by Kirsten Dunst three years ago does NOT qualify as vintage and letting Reese Wintherspoon wearing the same fugly dress to the Golden Globes this year is pretty humiliating considering the fact that, a.the dress is shit fugly and b. Kirsten Dunst wore it before! I mean, she wore that ugly shit before!

And before you could scream scandal, the same shit happens again. At the same event. Hell, is everybody coked up to their asses in Chanel's office? Or did Uncle Karl farted and you guys got blinded by the smoth? Natalie Portman's dress was wore by Debra Messing almost 5 years ago and could somebody tell Chanel's people that that doesn't qualify as vintage too? I bet Kirsten Dunst is laughing her skinny ass to death right now as she wore that damn thing in the Spiderman 2 movie too.

Anna Wintour, high-end fashion's bitchiest Godzilla, maybe fuming mad right now that such craptastic thing could have happen to Chanel of all people. And they even denied designing Mariah Carey's totally fugly Golden Globes couture gown maybe because they realised how awful Chanel looked on Mariah Carey. Mimi, I admire you because you're not ashamed to show the world that you have some smokin' curves, but please toned down on the cleavage flashing and robotic smile, I got a weak heart.

Re-Launching

Man, where the hell have I been? Finally drag my fat sorry ass back here after trying to spun a new blog over at shineblog.com. The colors and chinese fonts over there had me temporarily blinded. The templates and layout pissed me off to no end so I retrace back to my humble little blog over here.

First up, I guess you have seen this little animated GIF file between Jennifer Anniston and Maddox Jolie-Pitt. This is going to be in my most hilarious stuff of 2006 list. It's so funny I can't stop watching it over and over again. My favourite part? "Karma's a bitch, babycakes." "What the holy fuck does that mean?" Got me laughing like a crazy hyena.

Downloaded and finally watched it last week. To say that I'm dissappointed as to extremely miffed is a lie. What the fuck is going on? The costly CGI effects looks cheap, the story unfocused and the acting laughable. Jang Dong Gun is the slave with a funny accent, Hiroyuki Sanada is the foolish lovestrucked general, Nicholas Tse is a weepy, closeted queen and Cecillia Cheung is a pasty white doll who is too stoned. The moment I realised something's wrong is during the scene where Nicholas Tse's Duke stormed the Imperial Palace challenging the Emperor. Cecellia! You need more acting classes!! I don't understand why men fall over her like dead flies in the movie. I don't even feel the sexual tensions, bitch.

Overall, watch it if you wanna see how cheesy it is. Or just watch the parody, "The Bloody Case that Started From A Steamed Bun", which is definately better than the original movie itself. The original chinese title is funnier, <一个馒头引发的血案>. Damn, these bitches are geniuses.